The Landing Page Review · Free · 2 days

What a first-time visitor understands about your product.

Four things a buyer has to understand, in order. I name the first one your page doesn't deliver.

Free · 2 days · Nothing to credit, it's free

Two days. Free. No follow-up unless you ask for one.

Landing page review10 Aug 2026
ClarityWeak
RelevanceFailed
ValueNot reached
DifferentiationNot reached
Your page never says who it's for.

The full output carries the wireframe, the fixes in order and one line rewritten.

See the full output →

Who this is for

Who this is for, and who it isn't.

This is for you if

  • You suspect the site isn't landing but can't say why
  • You've changed the messaging twice this year and neither stuck
  • You want a second opinion before spending money on a rewrite
  • You're curious what I'm like to work with before paying me anything

This isn't for you if

  • You want the page rewritten. One line, not the homepage.
  • You want a full positioning review, which is GTM Foundations.
  • You're after a sales call in disguise. Most people who take this never buy anything, and that's fine.

What you get

What lands in your inbox.

The four layers, scored

4 LAYERS · PASS, WEAK OR FAIL

Clarity, relevance, value and differentiation, each with the question it answers, a verdict and one line of evidence from your actual page. Friction listed separately, unscored.

See the full output →

Used byFOUNDERS
Where it breaks first

1 FINDING · THE ONE THAT BLOCKS THE REST

The layers are strictly ordered. I name the first one that fails, and why nothing below it can be judged until that one is fixed.

Used byFOUNDERS
Where readers stop

1 WIREFRAME · 1 STOP LINE

The exact line where a sceptical reader gives up, and what that costs you.

Used byWHOEVER OWNS THE SITE
The three changes, in order

3 CHANGES · ORDERED BY COST

Ordered by what it costs to leave them alone. Not a list of twelve.

Used byWHOEVER OWNS THE SITE
One line, rewritten

1 LINE · YOURS TO PASTE

I write one of the three for you. Finished, and yours to paste whether or not you ever pay me anything.

Used byANYONE

ALL FIVE ARE FREE. NOTHING TO CREDIT, NOTHING TO SIGN.

See it running →

How it works

How it works.

You send the URL. I read it the way a first-time visitor reads it: fast, sceptically, and looking for a reason to leave. Two days later you get a written review. No call, no deck, no follow-up sequence.

How it gets made

What goes in

Your live page
A stranger's first five seconds
The page's own words

Every verdict quotes the page

What comes out

The review

One line rewritten, before and after

How long

1day

turnaround

re-run after any homepage change

The output, in full

One page read as a stranger reads it, against four questions in strict order: what is it, is it for me, do I want it, why you. The review stops at the first failure, because the reader already did.

Built on WealthKarma, a retirement app for Gulf expats. Every count is real and every gap is marked as a gap.

Landing page reviewthewealthkarma.com · 10 Aug 2026
01 · The page
Headlinehalf doing its job
Subheadfailed
Bodynobody got here
Below the foldyour only difference, unread
02 · The four layers
Clarity
Weak
“Be Wise. Grow Well. Live Wealthy.” Three verbs, no noun.
Relevance
Failed
“Expat”, “Gulf” and “UAE” appear nowhere above the fold.
Readers stop hereTwo layers never reached
Value
Not reached
No price and no outcome above the fold.
Differentiation
Not reached
Teaching before investing sits below the fold.
03 · The finding
Your page never says who it's for.
04 · Fixes, in the order to make them
01
Relevance — nobody named
Put “Gulf expats” in the subhead, above the fold.
02
Clarity — no noun
Name the category in the headline. It's a retirement plan.
03
Differentiation — below the fold
Move teaching-before-investing above it.
05 · One line, rewritten
Before
Be Wise. Grow Well. Live Wealthy.
After
Retirement planning for Gulf expats who haven't started.
06 · What this can't tell you
Whether real buyers agree. One reader against a model, not a panel.
Whether the product is the problem. This reviews the page, not what it sells.
Whether the traffic arriving is the right traffic.

What it costs

What it costs.

Price

Free

Invoiced in

EUR

Duration

2 days

Credited

Nothing to credit, it's free

See pricing →

What this leads to

What this leads to.

GTM Foundations

Three months alongside you, starting with a two-week diagnosis you can stop after: who you’re for, what makes you different, and what you say.

€5,000/mo · 3 months minimum

GTM Foundations

01

Research

02

Competition

03

Segment, position & price

04

Message

05

Launch & enable

06

Measure & maintain

What a page can't tell you

April Dunford, who wrote the standard book on positioning, tests positioning in live sales conversations rather than homepage experiments. She's right, and it's the limit of this review. A page tells you whether the message lands. It doesn't tell you whether it's the right message.

Find which of the six →

Straight answers

Straight answers.

Is it actually free?

Yes. No call, no sequence. Most people who take it never buy anything, and that's fine.

What if my homepage turns out to be fine?

Then I'll say so, and tell you which of the other five stages is the likelier problem. Shorter email, still worth sending.

Will you rewrite the page?

No. One line, finished, yours to paste whether or not you ever pay me anything. The page itself is GTM Foundations.

How long does it take?

Two days.